Interactive Methods

Technology should not be used as a method for delivering information to learners, but instead it should be used as tools to assist learners in developing knowledge. Technologies should engage learners in meaningful learning, where learners are intentionally and actively processing information while pursuing authentic tasks in order to construct personal and socially shared meaning for the phenomena they are exploring and manipulating (Jonassen, Peck, Wilson, 1999). The goal of technology-constructive exercises is for technology to help learners articulate and reflect on what they already know and apply that to the new learning environment.

Excellent online course units apply creative combinations of teaching strategies, using methods like instructional units, case studies, simulations, video units and other Web based resources to encourage learners. Such courses adhere to the following:

  • The readiness principle, enabling learners to see the relevance of the material
  • The experience principle, respecting the expertise learners bring to the course
  • The autonomy principle, allowing learners to control their own learning paths through meaningful exercise and activities
  • The action principle, emphasizing clearly and continually the connections between what is being learned and the real world in which it is applied

Suggested Techniques

Concept Mapping

Concept maps are drawings or diagrams showing the mental connections that students make between a major concept the instructor focuses on and other concepts they have learned.

Purpose

This technique provides an observable ans assessable record of the students' conceptual schemata -- the patterns of associations they make in relation to a given focal concept. Concept Maps allow the instructor to discover the web or relationships that students bring to the task at hand -- the students' starting points. This assessment technique also helps the instructor assess the degree of "fit" between the students' understanding of relevant conceptual relations and the instructor's map and/or course objectives. With such information in hand, the instructor can go on to assess changes ans growth in the students' conceptual understandings that result from instruction.

By literally drawing the connections they make among concepts, students gain more control over their connection making. The Concept Map allows them to scrutinize their conceptual networks, compare their maps with those of peers and experts, and make explicit changes.

Related Teaching Goals

  • Develop ability to draw reasonable inferences from observations
  • Develop ability to synthesize and integrate information and ideas
  • Develop ability to think holistically: to see the whole as well as the parts
  • Develop appropriate study skills, strategies, and habits
  • Learn to understand perspectives and values of the subject

Strategy

The Concept Teaching instructional strategy involves the learning of specific concepts, the nature of concepts, and the development of logical reasoning and critical thinking. When designing units they may be deductive (rule to example) or inductive (example to rule).

Concept teaching should proceed through four primary phases:

  1. Clarify goals and conditions.
  2. Illustrate examples and non-examples.
  3. Students provide examples and non-examples to demonstrate attainment of concept.
  4. Guide students to think about their own thinking (examine their decisions, consequences of choices, how concept fits in with bigger picture).

Pros

  • Concept Maps reflect research in cognitive psychology by directing instructor and student attention to the "mental maps" used to organize what we learn.
  • Because it calls for a graphic response, this technique favors students with strong visual learning skills. These same students are often at a disadvantage in verbal assessment.
  • It prompts students to consider how their own ideas ans concepts are related, as well as to realize that those associations are changeable.
  • Concept Maps can serve students as prewriting and note-taking devices, in addition to being powerful self-assessment techniques.

Cons

  • Comparisons among student responses can be difficult to make unless the instructor restricts responses to choices from a closed list of terms. Such restrictions, however, will diminish student creativity and the variability of responses.
  • Students with well-honed verbal skills but less developed graphic skills may find this assessment frustrating ans question its value.

Suggested Uses

While students are likely to have some trouble identifying levels of association, they may have even more difficulty identifying the types of relationships among concepts. By going over a parallel example, you can clarify exactly what is expected of the student.

This technique is useful in any course that requires conceptual learning. In courses with a high theoretical content, Concept Maps provide insights into the connections students are making among theories ans concepts. At the same time, Concept Maps can be used to assess the connections students make between theories or concepts and information. In courses where students must learn large numbers of facts and principles, Concept Maps can help faculty see how and how well students are organizing those details into correct and memorable conceptual networks.

Before beginning instruction on a given concept or theory, instructors can use Concept Maps to discover what preconceptions ans prior knowledge structures students bring to the task. This information can help instructors make decisions about when ans how to introduce a new topic -- as well as discover misconceptions that may cause later difficulties. During and after a unit, they can use Concept Maps to assess changes in the students' conceptual representations. An ideal use of this technique is to employ it before, during, and after units on critical concepts.